Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of yanlilei64@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAJUiCkeKs6MUW9FLWiQ=wbbLM4o9E4m_-BC3se4LaJa+nn5p4w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4F1650D8.70504@leichtgewicht.at>
	<CANj_=iejGNpiOjWZHbaH_Psh1tUUzvkCgbZTSfchZuUojrXnvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F165407.7020401@leichtgewicht.at>
	<CAJUiCkeKs6MUW9FLWiQ=wbbLM4o9E4m_-BC3se4LaJa+nn5p4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:52:36 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CANj_=ichx5e55swtQ766=CJmeSuWFrp2WnLQps2uzf-c8SsvPg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Logo] Kap IT proposal #2
From: James Ong <yanlilei64@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

You have associated the logo with the recently half sunken luxury ship
in the newspaper? I'm agreed with Calvin Huang.


On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Calvin Huang <leze.majestes@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> Personally, I see more of a mountain/iceberg than a sunken ship, especial=
ly
> if you remove the reflection. It's a fine looking logo regardless.
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Martin Heidegger <mh@leichtgewicht.at>wr=
ote:
>
>> My _first_ association was a half-sunken ship when I saw the logo. And I
>> thought therefore the logo was inappropriate.
>> If I am alone with this first association I am fine with the logo but I =
am
>> pretty sure I am not the only one who thinks that way.
>> So: I hope it does influence the voters as I think its a valid concern.
>>
>> yours
>> Martin
>>
>>
>> On 18/01/2012 14:04, James Ong wrote:
>>
>>> It's doesn't matter what we see, I hope your message doesn't influence
>>> the voters.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Martin Heidegger<mh@leichtgewicht.at>
>>> =A0wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does no one see a half sunken ship?
>>>>
>>>
>>