Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of flexcapacitor@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <071401ccd1e8$8c0d9520$a428bf60$@davidarno.org>
References: <CB3318EC.39AFA%aharui@adobe.com>
	<B9F90F88-7628-49FA-B126-1FEEF5316C8F@gmail.com>
	<CAAgciqqwhnpywSFdY074FtkLqudXFWdsARMzN6rJSSEMdOO6yQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<F9AD905C-88B1-43EC-831C-818E74D603EF@gmail.com>
	<CAEFz_vtZn0RK9mBDnBw-YN_wy7Ecas1B4NtES2PrvEDGbBrnLA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANcBHECobifU+sYpoMcqn+GtFZCzfUuz91XE0rPcz-ZsZvkv8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<071401ccd1e8$8c0d9520$a428bf60$@davidarno.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 05:51:35 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <CANcBHEApLfu6ZgBMnVrY46fG=SQcd7_t7jQ0xdj+tUuSXOdxfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Goal for Flex: Strengthening large-scale Flex applications
From: jude <flexcapacitor@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444ee55a2e1b504b6677cb4

--f46d0444ee55a2e1b504b6677cb4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

The Flex SDK (the Apache Flex project) is the source of everything related
to Flex. If you want to get Flex you come here. Isn't this now the official
channel / site? Is there another site that people will go? If this *is* the
official place then it should be the landing page for Flex resources or
links to them.

This is obvious to me but if you cut off the branches of a tree they die on
their own. Right now the Flex Apache project is the tree. If you don't have
a source you have disjointed, independent entities all repeating. Maybe I'm
missing something.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:43 AM, David Arno <david@davidarno.org> wrote:

> > From: jude [mailto:flexcapacitor@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 13 January 2012 10:48
> >
> > I have to agree with Sebastian on this. I think it is the responsibility
> of the architects to
> > show how they intend the architecture should be used. At least in an
> abstract way.
>
> I'm going to repeat myself from yesterday here. If you think this
> documentation is useful, get writing it. Clearly some folk disagree with
> you
> and they won't help you write it. Others might agree and may help you.
>
> If what you commit it or submit it as a patch gets approval, then it'll
> form
> part of future Apache Flex releases. If folk veto it, it won't. Either way,
> it has to be more productive than this endless "Yes we should. No we
> shouldn't" bickering over this topic.
>
> David.
>
>

--f46d0444ee55a2e1b504b6677cb4--