Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AD75B4AB for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84558 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 18:12:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84395 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 18:12:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84387 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 18:12:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:12:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mattjpoole@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.54] (HELO mail-qw0-f54.google.com) (209.85.216.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:12:03 +0000 Received: by qabj40 with SMTP id j40so259480qab.6 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:11:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Y8I9JZyxcRq2YUnwvXw43bJtwA6YXx4HmXW4sZhyVHs=; b=du7AMJXXcuy7Gye9bjIo5BqI9VcFzoH6ePKcr8uj5iqusGnITgiHeQfQ9EfkYdZtLw tJ1GZJzwQABTjfbNZv9bPC1uFrOktNWWvKiyWTJcCLTQR2z9xcn98nW0cAoDERw4oVX2 YAStnXsg5gOeKfcSGes/ya+GS0BImGhAjbDA0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.110.3 with SMTP id l3mr26563133qap.12.1326219103159; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:11:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.53.136 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:11:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:11:43 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: logo thread discussion? From: Matthew Poole To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org, peter.elst@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3074d51c89c5c704b630723e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3074d51c89c5c704b630723e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That does beg the question how we organise tracking votes anyway On 10 January 2012 16:17, Peter Elst wrote: > I'm wondering if we should be providing feedback on the logo threads coming > in and have people make variations based on that. I'd say if people want > feedback they can always reach out but then we could keep the [LOGO] > subject line purely for final entries? > > Think it might get tricky to keep track of what is work in progress and > what is a final design submitted for consideration. > > - Peter > --20cf3074d51c89c5c704b630723e--