Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A9DA9532 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 04:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51102 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2012 04:00:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50712 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2012 03:59:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 50704 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2012 03:59:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:59:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rick.winscot@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.47] (HELO mail-pz0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 03:59:47 +0000 Received: by dadw11 with SMTP id w11so845043dad.6 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:59:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=8GipAttDg8p/zt88bbqcZbQeAgrKzAQprgc+8Lhrr5o=; b=ZwJRyH675eFxUDxw8ilK/qDytnTNH7Tdct0d0iybMyVS4zmsc6UGubYWi1eYOoAkXH 21f/+3/elGkwVN9c/DWfbpYdqmNpbvYJ8ZG0PLwtcSKht16iAce20njOJ37fJS9HzClu BBkoyVc3z4H9ip3AciuSU05GFBHvf9RPldOgE= Received: by 10.68.73.69 with SMTP id j5mr32252460pbv.11.1326772764251; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:59:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.234.6 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 19:59:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <16F98500875542318FF0C08C9CC497AA@gmail.com> <9B7117A5AB5B4686845A5B020F01B40A@gmail.com> <879074A1-24BC-40FE-9A25-E4C81CADCF3C@tink.ws> From: Rick Winscot Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:59:03 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flex - lightweight event handling To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Tink - I guess what I'm trying to say is that a hybrid approach yields optimal results... here's one of the best examples of interplay between events, binding, signals, and IoC. There's a link at the bottom of the page to a bare-bones example. http://blog.foomonger.com/2010/02/26/swiz-signals-and-mediatesignal/ R On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Tink wrote: > On 16 Jan 2012, at 23:00, Rick Winscot wrote: > >> Tink - sounds like this was a veeeery long time ago? NativeSignals would >> have made sense to keep your module size under control... and then switch >> back to pure signals for performance when needed. >> >> -- >> Rick Winscot > > > It was some time ago and I haven't looked at NativeSignals. What would be > the advantage of using a NativeSignal if I didn't create all the getters for > the type safety? > > Any links etc would be appreciated. > > Tink >