Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 978169FE5 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:25:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40338 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2012 00:25:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 40188 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2012 00:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 40180 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2012 00:25:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:25:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of peter.elst@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:25:50 +0000 Received: by qcsp14 with SMTP id p14so2268419qcs.6 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=9a2gxZZQBQuRyI6W+vPaBMea/Fr1868gwfWfEzewNd0=; b=o7iCRU1Dd7oYB087Ll8JImIzlRBwLPoySwD5z7Fzmb8ywpKcug/20B/dy03QRkeZuZ x+tNbEAfEUiNJn9tGRyOm3CwygGhln9NEvYM6DEG3MJsNEfwJiVE25UPLifR2YtflQ+t L+mYqBgkPYQOjbwPKfWwTMxlu511zspsquDwI= Received: by 10.229.75.152 with SMTP id y24mr1594622qcj.65.1326846330206; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.133.207 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:25:09 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: peter.elst@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: From: Peter Elst Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:25:09 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Falcon compiler source code / Falcon architecture To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org, rajubitter@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00235429dfd02ef92c04b6c27c7a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --00235429dfd02ef92c04b6c27c7a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Do you think that it's still desirable for Falcon to be a separate ASF > project? If I understood correctly there is quite a dependency between the two - in which case perhaps a subproject would make more sense? - Peter --00235429dfd02ef92c04b6c27c7a--