Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3036E9D68 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53043 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2012 21:37:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53002 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jan 2012 21:37:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52994 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jan 2012 21:37:54 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:37:54 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username bdelacretaz, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:37:54 +0000 Received: by eaah1 with SMTP id h1so132933eaa.6 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:37:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.114.2 with SMTP id c2mr6477697ebq.66.1327009072315; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:37:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.29.133 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:37:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <6B0DD3B4-E307-46C1-8498-8EF2DA251965@gmail.com> <9C8AE3BE-4482-42DC-92D3-0098CC632845@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:37:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: Code Example / Application Development Procedure (was: Re: Non-core code, contrib and samples (was: Goal for Flex: Strengthening large-scale Flex applications...)) From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Peter Elst wrote: > ...If it must happen, wouldn't this rather be something for the flex-dev list? > My thinking was that the user list is for support questions not best > practices discussions... I don't know, that's probably one of those edge cases. > > Is there a best practice like a [Discussion] subject line prefix that is > typically used? > There's [DISCUSS] but it's usually for something that's meant to be voted on later, and it wouldn't be very specific in this case. This community can invent more such [tags] if needed. Maybe [style] for coding style discussions. -Bertrand