Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C56129584 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 14:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94446 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 14:49:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94417 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 14:49:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 94409 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2012 14:49:17 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:49:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-ee0-f47.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username bdelacretaz, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:49:17 +0000 Received: by eeit10 with SMTP id t10so356615eei.6 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:49:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.97.74 with SMTP id s50mr864466eef.106.1325774955436; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 06:49:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.29.133 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 06:49:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:49:15 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: On voting (was:First Flex release as soon as possible?...) From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Ryan Frishberg wrote: > ...@Bertrand, with regards to voting, does that mean we shouldn't respond > with "+1" unless the title of the thread is "[VOTE]". It's absolutely fine to use +1 to say "I agree", but unless the message subject says [VOTE] it never counts as a vote. > ...If something > comes up in a thread that requires a vote, should we always create a > separate "[VOTE]" thread for that issue?... Yes - the goal is to make sure people who only skim message headers quickly don't miss a vote. More info about voting at http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html -Bertrand