Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CB335A13.39BB8%aharui@adobe.com>
References: 
 <CAEFz_vvzGt6zgVRLFeQEk5NaiMTfC8QrEPZJy8Fj-kePxr-rbg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CB335A13.39BB8%aharui@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:44:04 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CAEFz_vuQrkhRRez6TiSstQ--dhyu8DZEX7Be9MnUEfSaZk-VnA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ActionScript and Apache Flex
From: Omar Gonzalez <omarg.developer@gmail.com>
To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043bdede9015e504b64a0b2e

--f46d043bdede9015e504b64a0b2e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/11/12 2:51 PM, "Omar Gonzalez" <omarg.developer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> If the compile time improvement in Falcon is as good as we're hoping and
>> hearing from people like Deepa then it sounds like Falcon should have the
>> bandwidth for more features such as preprocessing meta data, or am I
>> expecting too much from Falcon?
> Last metrics from Falcon are 2x for non-incremental compiles.  Some things
> run 10x in incremental compiles.  Hard to say if those numbers will change
> before it ships.  Would you be willing to sacrifice some of that for a
> pre-processing phase?
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>

If it meant having proper AS3 code annotations, a proper meta data API and
runtime performance increases for using said meta data API, then yes, I
would trade off some of the Falcon speed increase for features such as a
preprocessing phase.

-omar

--f46d043bdede9015e504b64a0b2e--