Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE97F9FC2 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 53612 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2012 23:02:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53564 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2012 23:02:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 53556 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2012 23:02:51 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:02:51 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-ww0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:02:45 +0000 Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so2323158wgb.0 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:02:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LCgvIc0y39C8KBVchsFNA9LgGO61v8SQ66rY/cHw3DY=; b=xeyiKAjleMg4Cs4+akZ0yt+JoYIOlGoerDD0C6KtPHEdV3fp6KFXn6UTveroR/oPRk +TwM+NOJJbfJd20Sq5JKje/zrdItIL6PnbDWK1HpwVaE6TExK4H3S//qtyp14j68nz4T lIga6gQSsEQD4FwuzssPgkdPQ+q1rBnHDB8Wc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.93.168 with SMTP id cv8mr14422826wib.2.1326322944144; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.13.44 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:02:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:02:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Goal for Flex: Strengthening large-scale Flex applications From: Omar Gonzalez To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c7fbaf174a004b6489f69 --f46d043c7fbaf174a004b6489f69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wednesday, January 11, 2012, Sebastian Mohr wrote: > @Roland > > hmm ... maybe you are right ;) But this is not my concern > now. I am talking about building large-scale Flex apps and > how to build them the best way. > > > -- Sebastian > > I get what you're saying and I totally feel you, but I don't think it is the responsibility of this project to teach how to use the framework in a best practices type of way. We're here to advance the SDK. Although I agree more educational material is required I don't think that is something we need to focus on at this point. That being said, nothing is stoping you from drafting such a document and bringing it to the list for discussion. If it is good and everyone agrees it can get voted to be adopted as official Apache Flex Best Practices, otherwise the community will vote it down and we will keep moving forward. At least this is my understanding of the "Apache way". -omar --f46d043c7fbaf174a004b6489f69--