Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 182BFBD21 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:48:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55347 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 19:48:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55035 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 19:48:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 54844 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2012 19:48:17 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:48:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of omarg.developer@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 19:48:09 +0000 Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so1877339wer.6 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:47:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=unNVQTXX0+QUQn2j7EHDi63hiFuW6CJ/VjVOM7kTrME=; b=BSPe85+BBBqKovkb+FGpzNqrig6+iNy6To7pUQW3LSMwSdhB5bT7Qrq46uEfsLYc8U 4Sl/u6lpMnKfwcDBJFLC3Rypcpgyl0nx9fn07d61nshhtTq9kRpwX0aamGRr0pI6HlsC jrKmZb8hV/na/Wu6bA3YN1o5bnCn7jLImoc8Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.132.20 with SMTP id n20mr676907wei.54.1326397669576; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:47:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.13.44 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:47:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20120112120925.18055uctfa0993np@www.teotigraphix.com> <4F0F1E1E.1040004@dot-com-it.com> <20120112131254.20047clbhmta98rq@www.teotigraphix.com> <049a01ccd159$6b58d4a0$420a7de0$@spoon.as> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:47:49 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] PPMC members to decide voting procedure From: Omar Gonzalez To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d7ee5bed0ee704b65a0507 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e6d7ee5bed0ee704b65a0507 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Randy Troppmann wrote: > > > > The PPMC members == the initial committers on the project. Yes, that > would > > mean that your vote would not count. > > > > -1 > > That is nonsense. While the initial commiters are rightly so experts > at what they do, I don't think they are necessarily experts at > creating or selecting a logo. There needs to be more voice heard on > this. > > - Randy > -1 I agree with Randy, I don't see the logo vote as something that should not be open to the entire Flex community, this is the brand of our, the community's, technology. Lets allow everyone to have a voice. -omar --0016e6d7ee5bed0ee704b65a0507--