Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of j.cabresos@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1655c88b$7ef734f8$36e7482c$@com>
References: <1655c88b$7ef734f8$36e7482c$@com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:16:14 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CADPmPaut602iSfdJtAcgPX2pBcUnKRwx7vmk+iTzBtRbxa07Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Apache Flex suggestion - dumping SWF support in favor of HTML5 -
 listen to Steve
From: James Roland Cabresos <j.cabresos@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org, flex@rduartes.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0447f26027737004b7b3c1bf

--f46d0447f26027737004b7b3c1bf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I know, but that project has already progress a lot I was thinking if that
project is supported then maybe it could improve to something we could use
Flex with and have really something working in less than a year. Just
wondering why it was not mention much in HTML5 related threads. will the
highly anticipated FalconJS better?

Just a suggestion, If the current Flex version can't be entirely ported or
be made compatible to FalconJS or any other AS3 to JS compiler because of
the limitations, perhaps we could just create a separate version of Flex
where it is optimized for these compilers. This way we may have something
that is working in less than 6 months I guess.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Rui Silva <flex@rduartes.net> wrote:

> Hi James,
>
> > From: "James Roland Cabresos" <j.cabresos@gmail.com>
> > Jangaroo anyone? It supports AS3 and has it's own compiler that converts
>
> > AS3 code to JS
> >
> > http://www.jangaroo.net/home/
> >
> >
>
> Jangaroo still only supports a subset of AS3 and some of the things that
> are not supported are extensively used in Flex.
>
> Rui
>
>

--f46d0447f26027737004b7b3c1bf--