Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B14A932A for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66942 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2012 06:28:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66840 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jan 2012 06:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 66831 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jan 2012 06:28:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:28:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of j.cabresos@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:28:01 +0000 Received: by obbuo9 with SMTP id uo9so1527493obb.6 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:27:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nI71WSMx5+PRqXZkB1mXA+z8OTVuvvWxtxat6f3OLRM=; b=K4rR4coYEhCj1UZPlwfQCI+Foay11UNidHq9Gq8oeDsDMhvxe4ud5ji35h/BMwd+JQ /P26WvA35CuMUKmHpflMUxVHp3rwLRHOlNw7oDr/gryQy35kirj5EbpHd5FBQYZh1PfW J04CZCdRlm+Gx0q2y7HDYpCuMAk9KzmSob8t4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.231.100 with SMTP id tf4mr5131650obc.56.1327645660838; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:27:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.20.70 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:27:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:27:40 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [BLOG Post Proposal] Logo Contest Update From: James Roland Cabresos To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04479615007c6604b77c9849 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d04479615007c6604b77c9849 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 OMG... please, not another contest... On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:26 PM, James Ong wrote: > I'm thinking if there a need for a contest whoever can tweak #42 logo > with better design? > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Jonathan Campos > wrote: > > I would remove any fallen f discussion and just be positive about good > > proposals. Wouldn't want to be picking at anyone. > > On Jan 26, 2012 11:54 PM, "Doug Arthur" wrote: > > > >> Here's my blog post proposal, I will post it tomorrow if no one opposes. > >> -Doug > >> > >> ------------------- > >> Logo Contest Update: > >> > >> The logo contest was a major milestone for our project. The community > >> and PPMC members came together and voted on a logo, and were in-sync > >> for the entire ride. The community and PPMC members both chose #42 and > >> #49 as the top choices in the first round. This was a clear sign that > >> the community and PPMC are in-sync. This contest has shown how > >> thriving and active this community is, and suggests it will continue > >> to be. Not only has this contest been evidence of the cohesion of the > >> community as a unit, but the sheer amount of topics and active > >> community members engaging in these discussions have made this a great > >> project to be a part of. > >> > >> There a lot of awesome discussions going on, and some of those > >> discussions are even a little bit difficult, but they are still > >> incredibly productive. There was a bit of discussion surrounding the > >> impact of the logo and how it would reflect as the image for our > >> project. Of the top two logos, #49 by Julien Brehier, was considered > >> to be viewed as a fallen "F", or a sinking ship. Others thought it > >> represented an A, merged with an F, and peaking for success (my > >> personal favorite). This was discussed in the second round of voting. > >> While #42 came out on top in the second round, #49 did have a top spot > >> with the community for the first round. A very good accomplishment, I > >> must say, for Julien. Congratulations! > >> > >> Now that the contest has wrapped up, the next step is to potentially > >> make some small tweaks to the logo. Some discussion has been made > >> regarding the color of the logo, and even the placement of the word > >> "apache" in the logo. If you subscribe to the flex-dev mailing list, > >> you can follow along as these developments unfold. > >> > >> These are some exciting times for Apache Flex, and I look forward to > >> being a part of this project. In addition, everyone involved should be > >> proud and excited to be part of this project and its future. > >> > --f46d04479615007c6604b77c9849--