Return-Path: 
 <flex-dev-return-351-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 894569F4F
	for <apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Thu,  5 Jan 2012 18:45:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 81870 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 18:45:58 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81803 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 18:45:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:flex-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <flex-dev.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 81795 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2012 18:45:57 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:45:57 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of randy.troppmann@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.175] (HELO mail-we0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:45:51 +0000
Received: by werm13 with SMTP id m13so646753wer.6
        for <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org>;
 Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:45:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=NivQebpOoqyBkYMJ4k2htD8O4VvnVzzuCgiQBYOk+L4=;
        b=wIFglKW17VS1FJbqJMV8geCgCGnq93xmiiGai2jTbgOXVj5AKkSAiQ+MrTY/Xb3BIg
         r0Es5GJL/q/e8lottiUuCufW/PbZQlVyTvHVK9QPRZPahWSb4uTIB8qD2RU9nC3vbbUm
         2tWiPfsAv9pzBWcm7UGklH6LyJvjNLkHvrEb8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.94.102 with SMTP id db6mr856764wib.0.1325789131392; Thu,
 05 Jan 2012 10:45:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.41.201 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:45:31 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6f01c673$5ad341a1$162fa912$@com>
References: <6f01c673$5ad341a1$162fa912$@com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 11:45:31 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAD0xzyFRnUggsxcgAvyPyub57w1-3RgcMpkbU0aV6+9CxbeJJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: First Flex release as soon as possible? (was: So, what should we
 do first?)
From: Randy Troppmann <randy.troppmann@gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org, flex@rduartes.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:26 AM, flex@rduartes.net <flex@rduartes.net> wrote:

> Just to be clear on my opinion, I suggested the same codebase, but didn't
> actually say anything about version number. For me the clarification
> between
> Adobe Flex and Apache Flex would be enough, but I also understand how
> that can be confusing.
>

+1 to that proposal. Sorry for my misunderstanding.

- Randy