Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B182F9BE5 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 23:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78617 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 23:24:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78571 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jan 2012 23:24:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78563 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jan 2012 23:24:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:24:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jonbcampos@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:23:59 +0000 Received: by obcwn6 with SMTP id wn6so1325889obc.6 for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:23:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Tx0wJnI1wRG5p0ylAto4jOFPkbgN61+jimzanbl/4cI=; b=s1cONhkaf8G7ea45W22TclVB6ZYu3x/Yq69lOufCFf+7jc/FCESYHaao8psFpZfJAn LmfjCE16G/ymDG+b64KHy3cWMkqZ/elG4wWaQHgN+HbVrioIxd1p4CHzXzQmk/eJTvhT crejWXzZgYD0SOFcCTz0HxC6BMAwaH9eOf7Zw= Received: by 10.182.122.71 with SMTP id lq7mr3090287obb.33.1325805819248; Thu, 05 Jan 2012 15:23:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.62.135 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2012 15:23:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120105181911.63115liab1655jov@www.teotigraphix.com> References: <20120105181145.19181zptoro7rvap@www.teotigraphix.com> <364CCDF4-5A9C-4F07-8EEB-AD55CE5EFEA4@realeyes.com> <20120105181911.63115liab1655jov@www.teotigraphix.com> From: Jonathan Campos Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:23:18 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FLEX Logo Sketch To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04478701e5c06004b5d03874 --f46d04478701e5c06004b5d03874 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > Sounds like there is opposition to something that looks like FX because of > infringement and opposition to the feather because I guess it looks to > artsy fartsy. I think anything with the feather looks too literal and takes away from a good logo. I'm a very minimalist though with logos. -- Jonathan Campos --f46d04478701e5c06004b5d03874--