Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F1E3BBB4 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 21:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 52388 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 21:08:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52360 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 21:08:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 52352 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2012 21:08:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:08:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jonbcampos@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.47] (HELO mail-ee0-f47.google.com) (74.125.83.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:07:59 +0000 Received: by eeit10 with SMTP id t10so11615439eei.6 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:07:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ankerh8JvZC+8mxmq+JI3b212654GVJVG49GLypbi00=; b=H3loQrhJsrKpj6slS/9BOZOYEPjfzgfuQ0uX0BuvsRQgSaqjgazc6qAhlkFg9KUcsO xfTH0Zpp02AixrY2HH4NQGkcZDKI895bovEk7jAZienQUzDGJUNHKhFGDmuJLaMKZbld vcYJKT+5HGcK7aSj/TITzhtvuenpDPirQLgOs= Received: by 10.204.156.210 with SMTP id y18mr14183959bkw.118.1325711257797; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:07:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.58.199 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:07:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120104160346.14214ryrloryh4fm@www.teotigraphix.com> References: <20120104160346.14214ryrloryh4fm@www.teotigraphix.com> From: Jonathan Campos Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 15:07:16 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flex modularity through composition and interfaces To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ce22698842304b5ba340d --0015175ce22698842304b5ba340d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 not sure how much we want to get into this but I disagree. After focusing on unit testing (making sure we don't break anything) I would think that DI would be most important on an architectural level. On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > Continuing the thread from "Committer duties and information" > > about setting interface priority to #1 in the future development fo Flex. > > Mike > > -- Jonathan Campos Dallas Flex User Group Manager http://www.d-flex.org/ blog: http://www.unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jonbcampos --0015175ce22698842304b5ba340d--