Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B31629B9E for ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12441 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2012 21:16:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12270 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jan 2012 21:16:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12262 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jan 2012 21:16:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:16:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dave2wave@comcast.net designates 76.96.30.16 as permitted sender) Received: from [76.96.30.16] (HELO qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:16:22 +0000 Received: from omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.11]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id T93l1i0080EPchoA19G29r; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:16:02 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.74] ([67.180.51.144]) by omta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id T9G11i00336gVt78M9G1wQ; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:16:02 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [OT] Atlassian From: Dave Fisher In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:16:01 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Adobe Connect.[1] It very clearly leverages Flash as you suggest. In = many of the same ways. Some are switching to that from GotoMeeting. Apache OpenMeetings[2] is in the incubator. [1] http://www.adobe.com/products/adobeconnect.html [2] http://incubator.apache.org/openmeetings/ On Jan 28, 2012, at 1:05 PM, jude wrote: > The Flash Player is unique in that it creates markets. When Adobe or > Macromedia added webcam support all of a sudden video chat = applications are > possible, QR code readers are made possible, augmented reality is made > possible, face recognition is made possible, motion tracking is made > possible, etc. (add "on a mass scale" to all of these things.) >=20 > When they added microphone support speech to text is made possible, = podcast > applications are made possible, voip are made possible, live digital = audio > software is made possible. >=20 > When they added video decoding support movies and television content = were > made possible. >=20 > At each of these points in time Adobe had a potential opportunity. = Think of > all the businesses that exist because of these features. Theoretically > speaking they could have made a Skype (and still can), they could and = can > make a Google Voice, they could and can make an iTunes. They could and = did > make a GoToMeeting but that's another story. But I *wouldn't* = recommend > them doing these things (not if it means laying off other teams). They = are > great at tooling and I think they should focus on that but there is a = way > for them to benefit from all of these innovations. >=20 > If I was trying to make Flash profitable I would have someone on the = Flash > Player and Flex SDK feature releases and forums and watch for and = promote > new projects using their new features. Then I'd invest in those = developers > and companies and do everything I can to make them successful. As the > developers and companies are successful, Adobe would be successful = too. > They'd also have a continual insight into the features and needs for = their > design and developer tools. Alex, I'll available immediately for this > position ;) >=20 > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Alex Harui wrote: >=20 >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Roland Zwaga [mailto:roland@stackandheap.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:33 AM >>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [OT] Atlassian >>>=20 >>> Hi Alex, >>>=20 >>> So I'm trying to understand >>> where >>> this disconnect between Adobe and its enterprise >>> customers stemmed from, when Atlassian is a great example of a = company >>> who >>> IS able to make money in that area. >>> Like I said before, I'm not attacking/bashing Adobe, I'm just trying = to >>> understand where things went wrong. >>>=20 >> I'm not involved in the business part of Adobe, but again, Atlassian = can >> get money from each employee at an enterprise customer. The Flash = Platform >> only gets money from each developer at an enterprise customer. >>=20 >> Frameworks are expensive and many very successful ones like JQuery = are >> 'free' and developed in the open. Adobe is trying to best serve its = Flex >> customers by following the same model. >>=20 >> The 'disconnect' was in the execution of the announcement of these >> changes, as has been discussed. >>=20 >> Alex Harui >> Flex SDK Developer >> Adobe Systems Inc. >> Blog: http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >>=20 >>=20 >>=20