Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
From: Rogelio Castillo Aqueveque <rogelio@rogeliocastillo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="Apple-Mail=_5FCFEC01-0C9B-44AE-A50A-06B238A2A940"
Subject: Re: Flex modularity through composition and interfaces
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:30:53 -0300
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAgciqqB5jv+HFtauRgb2yjcSdmaakkSkDVHUB0VJQ_P8hMeVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
References: <20120104160346.14214ryrloryh4fm@www.teotigraphix.com>
 <4F04C070.6020401@webfuel.pt>
 <815DF771-823D-476E-B8BC-609AFA887442@rogeliocastillo.com>
 <CAAgciqqB5jv+HFtauRgb2yjcSdmaakkSkDVHUB0VJQ_P8hMeVw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <604B6860-3514-40E2-A967-4C2966FB9BA6@rogeliocastillo.com>

--Apple-Mail=_5FCFEC01-0C9B-44AE-A50A-06B238A2A940
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=iso-8859-1

ooh, I guess I misunderstood the idea of DI, I thought about =
implementing other parsley/swiz/etc inside the sdk.

I'm all for modularity and DI within the framework.

R

---
Rogelio Castillo Aqueveque
rogelio@rogeliocastillo.com


On 4/01/2012, at 6:25 PM, Roland Zwaga wrote:

> I think Michael Labriola has some ideas about modularity and DI within =
the
> framework, his idea was definitely NOT to have Flex feature an IoC
> container like Swiz/SpringAS/SmartyPants etc.
> The DI features would be focused on framework modularity, not on
> *application* frameworks.
>=20
> On 4 January 2012 22:17, Rogelio Castillo Aqueveque <
> rogelio@rogeliocastillo.com> wrote:
>=20
>> I agree on modularity, but I reckon dependency injection is a totally
>> different thing which has lots of very good libs out there... not =
sure if
>> that should be part of the SDK.
>>=20
>> I believe that the focus should be on splitting the SDK into several
>> modules/libs, then think on interface design.
>>=20
>> R
>>=20
>> ---
>> Rogelio Castillo Aqueveque
>> rogelio@rogeliocastillo.com
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> On 4/01/2012, at 6:11 PM, Jo=E3o Saleiro wrote:
>>=20
>>> +1
>>>=20
>>> I agree with reducing strong-coupled dependencies as the first =
priority.
>>>=20
>>> I would also complement the use of interfaces with:
>>>=20
>>> - using dependency injection when possible
>>> - splitting the SDK into several libraries
>>> - support and advocate the use of Maven for managing dependencies =
(or
>> something similar)
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Jo=E3o Saleiro
>>>=20
>>> On 04-01-2012 21:03, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>>>> Continuing the thread from "Committer duties and information"
>>>>=20
>>>> about setting interface priority to #1 in the future development fo
>> Flex.
>>>>=20
>>>> Mike
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
> regards,
> Roland
>=20
> --=20
> Roland Zwaga
> Senior Consultant | Stack & Heap BVBA
>=20
> +32 (0)486 16 12 62 | roland@stackandheap.com | =
http://www.stackandheap.com


--Apple-Mail=_5FCFEC01-0C9B-44AE-A50A-06B238A2A940--