Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67F02B6B4 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:56:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28552 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 16:56:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28528 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jan 2012 16:56:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 28520 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jan 2012 16:56:47 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:56:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.175] (HELO mail-qy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.216.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:56:42 +0000 Received: by qcol42 with SMTP id l42so327896qco.6 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:56:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.136.19 with SMTP id p19mr1698060qct.133.1326387381519; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:56:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.28] (adsl-69-183-115-182.adsl.snet.net. [69.183.115.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o8sm11068276qaj.0.2012.01.12.08.56.20 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:56:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F0F10B1.6090105@dot-com-it.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:56:17 -0500 From: Jeffry Houser Reply-To: jeffry@dot-com-it.com Organization: DotComIt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org CC: Michael Schmalle Subject: How do we vote on logos References: <20120112113929.80502rwmtrn2hwht@www.teotigraphix.com> In-Reply-To: <20120112113929.80502rwmtrn2hwht@www.teotigraphix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/12/2012 11:39 AM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > Note, the PPMC members have still note decided how we are going to vote. I said this in another post, but in case it doesn't get lost; I decided to change the thread title and repost it. This is how I suggest we do voting on the logos: I was thinking at the end of the contest someone will create a vote thread with a link list of all the logos; then we can respectively +1, 0, or -1 each logo individually. Someone will tally up the votes and whichever has the highest score wins. Or we can do a re-vote if there is a tie. -- Jeffry Houser Technical Entrepreneur 203-379-0773 -- http://www.flextras.com?c=104 UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! -- http://www.theflexshow.com http://www.jeffryhouser.com http://www.asktheflexpert.com -- Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust