Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29C6B9874 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98415 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2012 19:09:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98346 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2012 19:09:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98338 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2012 19:09:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:09:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gosmith@adobe.com designates 64.18.1.23 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.18.1.23] (HELO exprod6og109.obsmtp.com) (64.18.1.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:09:36 +0000 Received: from outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com ([193.104.215.16]) by exprod6ob109.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTxXHWm2kOPqFrD3CiaEadlKSx8f+z8Mc@postini.com; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:09:16 PST Received: from inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com [153.32.1.51]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q0HJ9Dc9025351 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:09:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from nahub01.corp.adobe.com (nahub01.corp.adobe.com [10.8.189.97]) by inner-relay-1.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id q0HJ9CMM015720 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:09:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com (10.5.77.61) by nahub01.corp.adobe.com (10.8.189.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.192.1; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:09:12 -0800 Received: from nambx05.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.189.124]) by SJ1SWM219.corp.adobe.com ([fe80::d55c:7209:7a34:fcf7%12]) with mapi; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:09:12 -0800 From: Gordon Smith To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:09:11 -0800 Subject: RE: AS3 Enhancements: method overloading. Why do people want this? Thread-Topic: AS3 Enhancements: method overloading. Why do people want this? Thread-Index: AQJ5zH+31TSOp7tLGUcG+zWNvzoa/gLbGWP4AT6B+rIBzBau2ZSHM3jggACbxMA= Message-ID: <149F8129B58B2D418508E63117D9C5419ADD45A0A4@nambx05.corp.adobe.com> References: <034401ccd45e$621242c0$2636c840$@davidarno.org> <022e01ccd4fe$2baa8940$82ff9bc0$@davidarno.org> In-Reply-To: <022e01ccd4fe$2baa8940$82ff9bc0$@davidarno.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Not all optimization belongs in the compiler, especially if the optimizatio= ns make SWFs bigger and slower to load. The AVM can also optimize when it J= ITs the bytecode to native code, but then this increases JIT time. The trad= eoffs are complicated. Gordon Smith, Adobe -----Original Message----- From: David Arno [mailto:david@davidarno.org]=20 Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:56 AM To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: AS3 Enhancements: method overloading. Why do people want this? > From: Rick Winscot [mailto:rick.winscot@gmail.com] > Sent: 17 January 2012 00:51 > > I find it interesting that pretty much all the nay votes don't want it=20 > because it isn't pretty... or makes things feel strange or... > [ insert touchie feelie reason here ].=20 It's called "Software Craftsmanship" Rick :p > Overloading is a performance mechanism...=20 One of my biggest aims with Apache Flex is to tackle the lack of optimisati= on on the part of the compiler. Developers should be able to concentrate on= writing good code and not have to worry about performance. The latter is the job of the compiler. David.