From flex-dev-return-72-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Wed Jan 4 18:11:07 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06AFDB581 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:11:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88190 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 18:11:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88163 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jan 2012 18:11:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88155 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jan 2012 18:11:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:11:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of hugo.mig@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:11:01 +0000 Received: by obcwn6 with SMTP id wn6so14946195obc.6 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:10:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=vfwLB3HeQ7kO/5+B1m5YUa4UdFdgrF6fZjMz8AMYdIg=; b=VhIhTtaLY6yncp6/ypjz/VbYdi3fYzqTpnJ9+3PcrgW0VaowNS/HH2/xrdF5P1GGCP ZUqNvJ7J+n6tDw7HGO7mRTGbRM9e+vYumN5oTZNpuB5CII4oB8WJy+uwoEgekm4ytCun Jhzgyq0XdpqCMpoPjQ4SZHndF1f3hfAsY81Fo= Received: by 10.182.164.106 with SMTP id yp10mr6231170obb.71.1325700641157; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:10:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.62.196 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2012 10:10:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F048DA5.6000203@webfuel.pt> From: Hugo Miguel Pereira Matinho Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:10:20 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: the Flex website To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f643d1acb712204b5b7bbe3 --e89a8f643d1acb712204b5b7bbe3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok i can't see it anymore so i'll assume we don't have clearence to use the flex logo / or base something on that, could anyone clear that with adobe ? On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 17:38, Hugo Miguel Pereira Matinho < hugo.mig@gmail.com> wrote: > @Greg i believe i saw something related to adobe donating the logo right > to apache ... not sure i'll look into it and try to get you the link wher= e > i saw that ( don't remember if it was official though), but if we can > propose a logo that might also be interesting if anyone finds any added > value for that > > > 2012/1/4 Jo=E3o Saleiro > >> >> > I'd be in favor of anything that can drive interest and participation. >> >> I agree with Peter Elst. >> >> Jo=E3o Saleiro >> >> >> >> On 04-01-2012 17:30, Peter Elst wrote: >> >>> It was just a suggestion - certainly don't mean to undermine the >>> enthusiasm >>> or hold anyone back from getting involved and proposing a logo. >>> >>> What I've seen talking to people in the wider community, there doesn't >>> seem >>> to be a full understanding about the open nature at Apache or a >>> realization >>> that you can actually get involved. I'd be in favor of anything that ca= n >>> drive interest and participation. >>> >>> - Peter >>> >>> > --e89a8f643d1acb712204b5b7bbe3--