From flex-dev-return-865-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Jan 10 02:22:20 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16C179E75 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:22:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22414 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 02:22:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22290 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 02:22:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22281 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 02:22:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:22:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dougarthur@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.175] (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:22:13 +0000 Received: by wibhq7 with SMTP id hq7so3361125wib.6 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:21:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Ny1RsfmpmxeWIDB8trCN3xxgPV/+0R4SREB1LlQuFmU=; b=oMVN/N97mTbVYxOBfu1EvQAWZvROpy9iiA2fZ7L3Qh1ynJY+aL2NCkLr81sdk/HWMm dHNARYkU3YG4RT8v/KZXjS2Jyg9NhvfhLDLoP5+8qe2vuvc7uUsWLbtpO/OZLhgpXp/D YLMPo66BQej8RpCZPDeIaW/nPTtudT4lNp2ew= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.8.229 with SMTP id u5mr31527934wia.9.1326162112501; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:21:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.106.100 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:21:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.106.100 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:21:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <313af25a$6b85f8a9$2b36ed5$@com> References: <313af25a$6b85f8a9$2b36ed5$@com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 19:21:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: whiteboard From: Doug Arthur To: flex@rduartes.net, flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d044289eaa158b104b6232d35 --f46d044289eaa158b104b6232d35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Jan 9, 2012 5:01 PM, "Rui Silva" wrote: > Yet another approach that is kind of middle ground would be to not separate > by username, but to include the author's username in the branch name > alongside with the feature of the branch (I think it was Omar who suggested > this). Why not just require a README.txt in each whiteboard folder, and the responsible developer can place valuable notes on the work being done, including if they want everyone else hands off. Otherwise this is not a bad idea to keep features under whiteboard versus individual usernames. This is one area where git is handy. - Doug --f46d044289eaa158b104b6232d35--