From flex-dev-return-889-apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Jan 10 11:27:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEF8DB171 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70115 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 11:20:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-flex-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70030 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2012 11:19:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact flex-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 70011 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2012 11:19:43 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:19:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lekant@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.47] (HELO mail-pw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:19:35 +0000 Received: by pbcc11 with SMTP id c11so2412890pbc.6 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:19:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=+Wdg+34J1ZpQV1Cl2BnjhuR0o8cn585NO90Cse5L5kM=; b=qQhQl3cPRqbu3F+OHPmAddiMX0FooG3PyvBqGdMCdeL6hj/C7HerogBiiF2DnnME9S 1wthSK2hRRYovmQptZq9F93cVVmWzBhT2sGUug1kBaapO391qbNE4i9Ik+xzmVNxqHGd IDTHNUwB3OxVniivxZkrW+sW7sLhbk8KJcwig= Received: by 10.68.199.4 with SMTP id jg4mr49677115pbc.131.1326194354105; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:19:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.28.98 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:18:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <23a1c38d$366da5d0$10a06976$@com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Quentin_Le_H=C3=A9naff?= Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:18:53 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Playing around with Carlos' logo proposal To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: flex@rduartes.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f64724d612cca04b62aafab X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8f64724d612cca04b62aafab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 i agree this is pretty simple and efficient but we have to make it more apache and less adobe On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Matthew Poole wrote: > Its pretty cool, but looks a bit close to the Adobe logo, there may be > issues with that... > > On 10 January 2012 09:33, Rui Silva wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > As I've told earlier, I played around a little bit with Carlos' logo > > proposal and came up with a few variations that, to my eyes, solve one of > > the problems I identified with it, namely readability. I'm still not > happy > > with the balance and I am the first to agree that the arc in the E letter > > seems a little off and maybe even too thick. Anyway and apologizing in > > advance to Carlos for being so bold as to mess up with his design, these > > are very rough ideas that are in no way meant to be taken too seriously. > > Basically they're just a visual thinker's way to express his opinion on > > something... :) > > > > Oh, I've also tried a couple of variations for a square logo. I'm not > sure > > how I feel about them, but since I've spent quite some time fiddling > around > > with them I thought I'd just get them out here. > > > > You can find the experiments here: > > http://www.rduartes.net/assets/apache-ml/img/flex-logo.jpg > > > > Thanks, > > Rui > > > > > --e89a8f64724d612cca04b62aafab--