flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sebastian Mohr <masul...@gmail.com>
Subject Non-core code, contrib and samples (was: Goal for Flex: Strengthening large-scale Flex applications...)
Date Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:25:06 GMT

Would there be any legal issues when using
third party Opensource libraries in these Apache 
Flex code examples?

Here are some Opensource-Microarchitectures 
which are commonly used when building Flex apps:

Cairngorm 2, Cairngorm License, MIT License ... http://sourceforge.net/adobe/cairngorm/wiki/License/
Cairngorm 3 Libraries, Cairngorm License, MIT License ... http://sourceforge.net/adobe/cairngorm/wiki/CairngormLibraries/
Mate, Apache License,  Version 2 ... http://mate.riaforge.org/
PureMVC,  Creative Commons license ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses
Robotlegs, MIT License ... https://github.com/robotlegs/robotlegs-framework/blob/version2/LICENSE
Parsley, Apache License 2.0 ... http://www.spicefactory.org/parsley/
Spring AS, Apache Software License, Version 2.0 ... http://www.springactionscript.org/license.html
Swiz, Apache License 2.0 ... http://swizframework.org/


I have created some code examples 
which I would be willing to contribute:


... but I am not an expert on these legal issues.

-- Sebastian

On Jan 13, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Rui Silva <flex@rduartes.net> wrote:
>> ...While I'd
>> expect all code in Whiteboard to result initially from TRUNK branching, the
>> contents in CONTRIBS and SAMPLES could be or not....
> I wouldn't set *any* expectation on whiteboard stuff - think of it
> like a whiteboard in a conference room, you'll sometimes find drawings
> of people's last vacation scene on those, and that's fine ;-)
> -Bertrand

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message