flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: Flex Framework rsl's
Date Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:20:21 GMT



On 1/5/12 12:48 AM, "DiMiTRi" <koro@noos.fr> wrote:

> 
> Alex, can you elaborate of the reasons of Adobe's choice?
> I really think the signed RSLs were one of the most important factor of Flex
> adoption, because it helped to convince clients that the framework size was
> not a real issue.
It comes down to liability.  If Adobe did not test it, they don't want to
certify it, and even if Apache signed it, Adobe still doesn't want
responsibility.

I know for a fact that several enterprise apps are not using RSLs because
they've already made monkey-patches to the framework.

Are you sure your apps are benefiting from signed RSLs and that using more
modules wouldn't make your app faster?

Anyway, I agree it will be problem, but we will have to learn to live with
it.  My longer term goal is to make RSLs obsolete by improving modularity in
the framework.

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui


Mime
View raw message