Adobe will not be caching RSLs from Apache so yes, we want to reduce the
need for caching RSLs in the future.
On 1/4/12 1:34 PM, "Roland Zwaga" <roland@stackandheap.com> wrote:
> Its kind of sad since the framework RSL's then won't be put in the player's
> trusted cache, but then again, if the SDK gets better modularized there
> won't be a need to download half a meg worth of framework for a small
> application.
> So in the end, the trusted cache won't be missed hopefully...
>
> 2012/1/4 João Fernandes <joaopedromartinsfernandes@gmail.com>
>
>> On 1/4/2012 9:27 PM, Douglas Arthur wrote:
>>
>>> I was just thinking about RSL's and how Adobe hosts the framework RSL's
>>> on their servers. Will these be migrated over to Apache, or remain on
>>> Adobe's servers, or both? If they become hosted on Apache, will they be
>>> setup outside of an incubator uri so they don't ever have to change again?
>>> Has anyone considered this yet?
>>>
>>> Example: http://fpdownload.adobe.com/**pub/swz/flex/4.5.1.21328/**
>>> framework_4.5.1.21328.swz<http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.1.213
>>> 28/framework_4.5.1.21328.swz>
>>>
>>> - Doug
>>>
>>> From what I understood, they have no plans to host non Adobe swz for now
>> so any future release of the SDK will only use regular swfs as RSLs.
>>
>> João Fernandes
>>
>
>
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
|