flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>
Subject Re: AS3 Enhancements: method overloading. Why do people want this?
Date Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:14:24 GMT
If it would be implemented like it is in Java (not to say that would be the
case), the runtime method names would be mangled so that they actually are
different .  (send_ABSJD(), send_JNKFF(), for example)  -- there wouldn't
be any impact during runtime.  No different than how unnamed functions work
at the moment.

We would have to wait and see how the compiler handles this today to see
what and how it could be done.


On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jonathan Campos <jonbcampos@gmail.com>wrote:

> I would just want to see what the tradeoffs would be for the compiler and
> code execution before I am really for/against this addition.
> --
> Jonathan Campos

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message