flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gautam Pandey <gkp...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive
Date Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:52:14 GMT
There is no doubt FC is good tool to create some design but you cannot
create all kind of shape using FC. You have to use AI or other tool to
create complex path.
I guess main aim or goal of FC was to make skin development or theme
development independent of real component development. It cannot be
possible now because of various reasons. If u have any uncompitable error
or warning between FB and FC you can't import FB skin or theme to FC to
edit it. Still learning flex and around technologies and willing to
contribute to make open source flex successful.

On Jan 14, 2012 4:12 AM, "Herx" <admin@herx.org> wrote:

> A design view, at least a wireframing util is well worth the effort
> Herx
> Sent from Samsung Mobile
>  Alex Harui <aharui@adobe.com> wrote:
> On 1/13/12 2:17 AM, "jude" <flexcapacitor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Geez guys. Why is everyone against design views? I'm all for Flash
> > Catalyst. I'm all for what it was trying to solve.
> I don't think anyone is "against" it, but there weren't enough folks using
> it to make it worth the cost of developing/maintaining it.  Now that the
> cost is effectively zero, folks can certainly try to come up with a tool or
> utility to replace it.
> >
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message