flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Doug McCune <d...@dougmccune.com>
Subject Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive
Date Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:13:29 GMT
> I think spark is valid entirely without Fc.

> The only problem with spark right now is that need urgently to have some
> core components that today are obsolete in MX.
Yeah, you and Michael make the point that Spark is a good improvement
regardless of Fc, and I wasn't really trying to argue that it wasn't. I was
more lamenting the fact that a large amount of brainpower and man-hours
went into getting things capable of working with the Fc tooling. Manpower
that would have been better spent focusing on the core framework (and not
the Fc tooling considerations) and the component set. When I look at Fc I
just see a whole lot of wasted energy on all sides (framework engineers,
Flash Builder engineers, and Fc engineers).

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message