flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com>
Subject Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive
Date Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:17:34 GMT
Quoting Doug McCune <doug@dougmccune.com>:

>> I think spark is valid entirely without Fc.
>> The only problem with spark right now is that need urgently to have some
>> core components that today are obsolete in MX.
> Yeah, you and Michael make the point that Spark is a good improvement
> regardless of Fc, and I wasn't really trying to argue that it wasn't. I was
> more lamenting the fact that a large amount of brainpower and man-hours
> went into getting things capable of working with the Fc tooling. Manpower
> that would have been better spent focusing on the core framework (and not
> the Fc tooling considerations) and the component set. When I look at Fc I
> just see a whole lot of wasted energy on all sides (framework engineers,
> Flash Builder engineers, and Fc engineers).

This is the great thing about this project, due to the mass of ideas,  
dead ends like FC/frameworks/components might be killed off before  
they even waste the project's time.


View raw message