flex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com>
Subject Re: Flex modularity through composition and interfaces
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2012 21:11:57 GMT

I'm still getting used to how I am not talking to someone in person  
here and my statements need to be more detailed.

What I meant is setting interface modularity as #1 priority when  
designing or implementing new features. So the problems are non  
existent when "new" features are released.

I definitely wasn't speaking about refactoring the whole framework to  
interfaces as a #1 priority. :)

In no way was I speaking about #1 priority of this whole project, that  
doesn't even make sense to me.


Quoting Jonathan Campos <jonbcampos@gmail.com>:

> not sure how much we want to get into this but I disagree. After focusing
> on unit testing (making sure we don't break anything) I would think that DI
> would be most important on an architectural level.
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Michael Schmalle  
> <mike@teotigraphix.com>wrote:
>> Continuing the thread from "Committer duties and information"
>> about setting interface priority to #1 in the future development fo Flex.
>> Mike
> --
> Jonathan Campos
> Dallas Flex User Group Manager
> http://www.d-flex.org/
> blog: http://www.unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos
> twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jonbcampos

View raw message