fineract-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Myrle Krantz (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (FINERACT-357) Address the review comments for 0.6.0-incubating release
Date Thu, 12 Jan 2017 08:42:52 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Myrle Krantz updated FINERACT-357:
----------------------------------
    Description: 
As part of 0.5.0-incubating release, we got the following review comments from IPMC members
which should be addressed for 0.6.0-incubating release.
3) Including License and License.md will confuse the people
4) The LICENSE maye be missing a license for jquery
5) Remove the list of software included in the binary release from the source release LICENSE
file. It’s fine to have two different license files
6) The convenience binary file is missing LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER in the top level,
however the LICENSE and NOTICE file is inside the war and look correct

Relevant e-mails:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201612.mbox/%3CE4A4287E-8A78-4A61-9666-0F111BFA9D7C%40classsoftware.com%3E

  was:
As part of 0.5.0-incubating release, we got the following review comments from IPMC members
which should be addressed for 0.6.0-incubating release.
1) Maven repo should be included in place of war file for the next release
2) Gradle should be integrated in the top level directory. Currently it is integrated with
fineract-provider. (RAT issue)
3) Including License and License.md will confuse the people
4) The LICENSE maye be missing a license for jquery
5) Remove the list of software included in the binary release from the source release LICENSE
file. It’s fine to have two different license files
6) The convenience binary file is missing LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER in the top level,
however the LICENSE and NOTICE file is inside the war and look correct

Relevant e-mails:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201612.mbox/%3CE4A4287E-8A78-4A61-9666-0F111BFA9D7C%40classsoftware.com%3E
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201612.mbox/%3CCA%2BULb%2BvcXGe5C%2ByiXdGS2gTD3vnpcs1e%3DoW5D6hffLSt%2BmOn0A%40mail.gmail.com%3E


> Address the review comments for 0.6.0-incubating release
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FINERACT-357
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-357
>             Project: Apache Fineract
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: User Management
>            Reporter: Shaik Nazeer Hussain
>            Assignee: Shaik Nazeer Hussain
>
> As part of 0.5.0-incubating release, we got the following review comments from IPMC members
which should be addressed for 0.6.0-incubating release.
> 3) Including License and License.md will confuse the people
> 4) The LICENSE maye be missing a license for jquery
> 5) Remove the list of software included in the binary release from the source release
LICENSE file. It’s fine to have two different license files
> 6) The convenience binary file is missing LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER in the top level,
however the LICENSE and NOTICE file is inside the war and look correct
> Relevant e-mails:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201612.mbox/%3CE4A4287E-8A78-4A61-9666-0F111BFA9D7C%40classsoftware.com%3E



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message