fineract-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Saransh Sharma <sara...@theupscale.in>
Subject Re: [IMPORTANT] Query regarding standard address table
Date Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:45:20 GMT
What about geo mapping ? which enables the latitude and longitude from
google maps or some other service

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:41 PM Nikhil Pawar <nickrp89@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Please find the attached schema diagram of the proposed Address and
> related configuration tables.
> A quick description of the diagram:
> Address table:
> The fields of the address table would be configurable. The user can select
> the field via field configuration table.
> Rest of the fields are self explanatory.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Ankit Sharma <ankit@theupscale.in> wrote:
>
>> Hi team,
>> We have already made addresses - official, residential and permanent as a
>> standard feature of CB.
>> Looking forward on this.
>>
>> Ankit Sharma
>> Upscale
>>
>> > On 30-Jun-2016, at 1:42 PM, Ashok <ashok@confluxtechnologies.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> > It makes sense to have a standard address with minimal fields to
>> support CB
>> > or any other integrations and can be extended/configurable by
>> organization.
>> >
>> > Thanks and Regards,
>> > Ashok
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Nayan Ambali <nayan.ambali@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dayna, Markus,
>> >>
>> >> I feel, adding standard address to customer solves other problems too,
>> >> example address can be made mandatory before activating client,
>> address can
>> >> be capture along with customer creation, Geo location based service on
>> >> Android can built.
>> >>
>> >> i vote for adding client address as standard(out of box) feature.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks
>> >> Nayan Ambali
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Thanks and Regards,
>> >> Nayan Ambali
>> >> +91 9591996042
>> >> skype: nayangambali
>> >>
>> >>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:07 PM, <nikhilpawar@yahoo.in> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello Devs,
>> >>>
>> >>> While designing the credit bureau module, I came across few design
>> >>> questions and I wanted community's opinion on that.
>> >>> When you make a credit check query, the credit bureau expects you to
>> send
>> >>> the address along with few other identifiers.
>> >>>
>> >>> In order to fetch the address fields in a more hassle free and less
>> error
>> >>> prone way, I was thinking if we can standardize the address as core
>> table.
>> >>> By standardizing this address table, we may remove the need for
>> defining
>> >>> custom data table for storing addresses.
>> >>>
>> >>> Let me know your thoughts on this proposal of mine.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Nikhil
>> >>
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message