fineract-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ashok <as...@confluxtechnologies.com>
Subject Re: [IMPORTANT] Query regarding standard address table
Date Thu, 30 Jun 2016 08:12:51 GMT
+1

It makes sense to have a standard address with minimal fields to support CB
or any other integrations and can be extended/configurable by organization.

Thanks and Regards,
Ashok

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Nayan Ambali <nayan.ambali@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dayna, Markus,
>
> I feel, adding standard address to customer solves other problems too,
> example address can be made mandatory before activating client, address can
> be capture along with customer creation, Geo location based service on
> Android can built.
>
> i vote for adding client address as standard(out of box) feature.
>
> Thanks
> Nayan Ambali
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Nayan Ambali
> +91 9591996042
> skype: nayangambali
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 6:07 PM, <nikhilpawar@yahoo.in> wrote:
>
>> Hello Devs,
>>
>> While designing the credit bureau module, I came across few design
>> questions and I wanted community's opinion on that.
>> When you make a credit check query, the credit bureau expects you to send
>> the address along with few other identifiers.
>>
>> In order to fetch the address fields in a more hassle free and less error
>> prone way, I was thinking if we can standardize the address as core table.
>> By standardizing this address table, we may remove the need for defining
>> custom data table for storing addresses.
>>
>> Let me know your thoughts on this proposal of mine.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nikhil
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message