fineract-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sander van der Heyden <>
Subject Re: Extending the Client Data
Date Mon, 11 Apr 2016 07:34:18 GMT
Hi Saranash,

I think while one set of data is needed in India, other countries will need
other sets of data, which is where the original design idea for the
datatables came from. Especially when also looking at the platform in a
broader sense and use by other types of providers, such as asset
financiers, P2P lenders etc.

>From my side adjusting this would be fine, as long as it is a post-install
configuration to enable/disable additional fields in the core m_client
table, integrated in the same way we use the datatables. But happy to hear
some other thoughts.


Sander van der Heyden

CTO Musoni Services

Mobile (NL): +31 (0)6 14239505
Skype: s.vdheyden
Follow us on Twitter!  <>
Postal address: Hillegomstraat 12-14, office 0.09, 1058 LS, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:21 PM, Saransh Sharma <>

> To:Client data Added Fields
> First Question, to the PR made by anuragmath
> Second Question?
> Do we really need this?
> So what i think is
> When we collect Primary Information about the client, is only relevant,
> I don't see How fathername, emailAddress and MaritalStatus and other
> relevant parameters are not already there in the client resource,
> Ok we can say that , We can use the dataTables approach in the fineract
> platform but accessing that resource is easy also, its the same, but that
> approach seems dull to me, can someone like to point why should we not
> DataTables for these primary data pointers
> But in India we use FatherName, Religion ,MaritalStatus,Dependents, as well
> where these are all primary data
> Open Discussion To Community

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message