Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 628D118E21 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43688 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2016 20:03:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 43633 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2016 20:03:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 43620 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2016 20:03:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:03:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2F047C6472 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:03:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=basistech.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihHrZS_3ms4e for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4E15B5F1EF for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 20:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id x21so24778960oix.2 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:03:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basistech.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sejCf18d16ODC4sanqYvTNrBLxYxJDdwK27Kezh3FWE=; b=c5M3R3ylZ1h2ZtwOytlFgJOebmwL+rZ1w9qOYjbaG5yDLKvjlcnboQV5z2zr9M/AfL N2FVqBly9gc0ZAh5JAv8wo56uKCG6ixnGhb5WWj8rhWtaGIBF7cGECDWQNl7zMPfLLmg zwFISDiWYHyblhk78nfhB04rfGyZQIdq0RwD8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sejCf18d16ODC4sanqYvTNrBLxYxJDdwK27Kezh3FWE=; b=M/Q7Y1cBVSME6qSbLeT8Q2s3mQcFNyxVlHdT3K33/PbpduzOvr+/Gvqnpml+C/hMpk GMAkJY27R7KM7sQ/qlOr89xkcHhZC6p+7xdg7Hky6eIy7tyKeuCUT+BQQVZo7aB8ppNX pk3Br83iNeUEv3k3V41o30lGGurSR/BKvrtfhGlHPnnCB8hwc3wxFneqgWw/u7XdYATa 8nm0Je8KJOFeQH1pDap72p8MTlWypt7tkgql8neKcHBXT0OsBoc5uf8IZGph3T7zzSTQ xTBq1lcjs7WKVnF/j/2dQYD8WAwSyTAGjWme7tKW6ILjGuI4FYCwvYGLFNfRJcC8FJAH 81QQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSrG/GeUBwF8UkZOBQMwBuiJkKeLcFFviNQGevtmDkeaSCWbAsZ2mnHDNtK/k1RxWYaTMtnq507CxW+6VeO MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.76.133 with SMTP id z127mr19366228oia.18.1456344227456; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:03:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.122.6 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:03:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:03:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Backtrace for intentionally circular dependency From: Benson Margulies To: users@felix.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113de8c6597020052c8990bf --001a113de8c6597020052c8990bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The curious thing is that my case works, noisily, unlike yours. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Victor Antonovich wrote: > BTW, we have similar rather long-standing issue: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4417 > --001a113de8c6597020052c8990bf--