Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1D7E10EAD for ; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45813 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2014 13:43:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 45764 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2014 13:43:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 45748 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2014 13:43:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:43:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.138.91.182] (HELO nm22-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com) (98.138.91.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:43:27 +0000 Received: from [98.138.100.116] by nm22.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2014 13:43:06 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.251] by tm107.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2014 13:43:06 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1043.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Mar 2014 13:43:06 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 498778.97581.bm@omp1043.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 38395 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Mar 2014 13:43:06 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1394804586; bh=1ALM5dkClL0TRkhhV+lgixrEiR3dSz+jw+w4aCeCoBs=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b0kTCkjFlEvJiz5ELZLT6WbFCtPJd+D7TGJbX9zRHdxpVhZt8Lk4K8jhgynKVacXpOoxOgQQB3nPIuwNKY22ACkrVuQmrwuhwARbemHxiX5bTYPy0AEFKNIv2RV4DywP24qKUNXH8vSIIIFng2NppZ8ZHx0gtyrc0uzYSUCFUeQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PfXe9GIiF8OuDqkxGuQIimR/WmWu+RI66LxjxUWr60nZjniNWx/unVuwDGhP6UXxMJpRO0LgHnFCi59qLKOPAcML4h3YtD3PQSsZTL7jfaKG+4PBm9gW+V2bdDlIm58ilC/+LDEYWygNDjtnR8WU1w/orAKCJkXR1hogAbLOv9k=; X-YMail-OSG: T8X.uBAVM1nooAgGBEY6mt4ZAZq1gU5YPNjYE7qB1kpbC7C 6O8jQyZGglYrlkJXMsJkYx6UVMKOeXRI2G4K55dz5mWmcS96vYxN_vX2B4pW eAJxGjDRn_M.ORkPvjC4RxCMOHR3Ixk7a6ncbsLI9pT1iTrk9iZbTx4.T3Gf b8EGOxaoVRI_vxEmtSdTLtgTNcJRzo0eZTysAT7TWkE8o2XtoEiddfe1sql1 cRKxvun3etKMFTtCk8.dXx39iVHRhnQbwjXYJhuSWxoeaFsXX5SEZUuclVo4 D5De9ogxPzG6qjVc8ykp9AS73Ls5.yrgIxO.pUhASZqwOFsH.Q0y8_iBh0Pp 4cNh6pQ2t85oeUk1HfSGV3w5TPRTimgdJhbr9PkPAzxCoWjBjhDCAwD.IjWv f6i1Nge.zLaAo9GCmy.6Yw1TjYcSLce8mCzi0MlpC.agz2PPa2VJf9uebOw1 Bc_Gm.YC4F4EeIdQEQ4QxJO3L_TLyF8qniGWtuDFgmMz7CRM8daCzm3zcqyP gZ1eiH0RBDZkhU6Qhd1cC0McE8TGE_Kp1LLpMFL0rkZ5IJ1cdBm3r.o.QzPl Dd9yGo9fuf2xt Received: from [50.59.214.30] by web125103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:43:06 PDT X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001,UGFydGlhbGx5IHllcywgbXkgY29kZSBsb2dpYyB3aWxsIGJlIGEgbWFqb3IgZmFjdG9yLsKgCldoYXQgSSB3YW50IHRvIGtub3cgaXMgYW55IGZyYW1ld29yayBvdmVyaGVhZCAtIHBlcmhhcHMgcmVsYXRlZCB0byByZXBvc2l0b3J5IHJlZmVyZW5jZSBsb29rdXBzLCBjbGFzcyBsb2FkaW5nIGV0Yy4gSSB3aWxsIHJ1biBhIHBlcmZvcm1hbmNlIGFuZCBzb2FrIHRlc3QgY3ljbGUgYnV0IGNhbiBiZW5lZml0IGZyb20gcHJpb3IgZXhwZXJpZW5jZSBvZiBmZWxsb3cgdXNlcnMuCgpUaGFua3MKCgoKT24gRnJpZGEBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.178.641 References: <1394799246.18557.YahooMailNeo@web125105.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1394804586.35313.YahooMailNeo@web125103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 06:43:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Dharmender Goyal Reply-To: Dharmender Goyal Subject: Re: Anyone using OSGI bundles for high volume OLTP applications To: Neil Bartlett , users In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="856753768-1431798324-1394804586=:35313" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --856753768-1431798324-1394804586=:35313 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Partially yes, my code logic will be a major factor.=A0=0AWhat I want to kn= ow is any framework overhead - perhaps related to repository reference look= ups, class loading etc. I will run a performance and soak test cycle but ca= n benefit from prior experience of fellow users.=0A=0AThanks=0A=0A=0A=0AOn = Friday, March 14, 2014 9:28 AM, Neil Bartlett wrote:= =0A =0AAll of these concerns -- performance, security, etc -- are pretty mu= ch orthogonal to OSGi. That is, it depends entirely on the code you run ins= ide OSGi rather than on OSGi itself.=0A=0ARegards,=0ANeil=0A=0A=0A=0A=0AOn = Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Dharmender Goyal wrote:= =0A=0AHello=0A>I am evaluating use of OSGI bundle based design to replace a= n existing high volume, multi-user (1000+) =A0J2EE implementation. My proto= types are working but want to know of any potential issues with deadlocks, = performance, security, scalability etc.=0A>Is there anyone using OSGI bundl= es for large scale implementations, possibly with JBoss, WAS or Tomcat? Any= suggestions?=0A>=0A>Thanks=0A>=0A>Dharmender Goyal=0A>dgoyal@yahoo.com --856753768-1431798324-1394804586=:35313--