Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B706810754 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92447 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 08:40:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 92158 invoked by uid 500); 19 Sep 2013 08:40:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 92110 invoked by uid 99); 19 Sep 2013 08:40:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:40:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.139.250.139] (HELO joe.nabble.com) (216.139.250.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:40:29 +0000 Received: from alf.nabble.com ([192.168.236.21]) by joe.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VMZli-0002DA-I5 for users@felix.apache.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 01:39:22 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 01:39:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Roland To: users@felix.apache.org Message-ID: <1379579945562-5005073.post@n6.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1378384535402-5004833.post@n6.nabble.com> <1378459665568-5004859.post@n6.nabble.com> <5229CAD5.9070000@ungoverned.org> <1379575234912-5005068.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: Re: How to improve the start time of Apache Felix MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Neil Bartlett wrote > [...] > > It does seem to suggest that resolution time is a factor. I wonder if > your test harness is capable of testing on Equinox and Knopflerfish as > well? The comparison could be enlightening. In particular I believe > that Equinox is able to persist resolution state and therefore might > start more quickly on the second and subsequent launches. > [...] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscribe@.apache > For additional commands, e-mail: > users-help@.apache I also think that resolving and creating wires between bundles consumes time. It depends on how many thirdparty-bundles are required. I need about 20 libraries. Most of the thirdparty-bundles do not implement a BundleActivator or register a Service but just export some packages (e.g. log4j, slf4j, commons.io,...). So, maybe we can save time if we can somehow store the *wires* in the bundle-cache after the fist startup (Serialization?), so that they are already / immediately available at a restart. Or start the bundles fast without resolving and resolve them later. I'm just thinking out loud. -- View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/How-to-improve-the-start-time-of-Apache-Felix-tp5004833p5005073.html Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org