felix-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Neil Bartlett <njbartl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: A couple of Felix Web Console questions
Date Wed, 21 Nov 2012 20:02:19 GMT
Justin,

Wow, yes, I hadn't spotted that. It's was so much more obvious in 4.0...

Houston, we have a problem!

Neil

On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Justin Edelson <justin@justinedelson.com>wrote:

> Neil-
> Unfortunately, the same license applies to the json.org code embedded in
> WebConsole 3.0.0 through 3.1.8.
>
> Regards,
> Justin
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Neil Bartlett <njbartlett@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Felix,
> >
> > I will not be able to use your aggregated bundle, and I think Graham
> would
> > not be able to either. The problem is the license for the "org.json"
> > package which you are proposing to embed and export, which contains the
> > following unfortunate sentence:
> >
> >     "The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil"
> >
> > While that may sound reasonable, I wish you luck finding two lawyers who
> > agree on the definitions of "good" and "evil".
> >
> > This dependency is why I cannot use Webconsole 4.0, whether or not you
> > import the package or export yourself.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Neil
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Graham Charters <gcharters@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, all, for the helpful info.  Felix, fwiw, I like your proposal.
> >  The
> > > purist in me doesn't particularly like aggregate bundles, but the
> > > pragmatist accepts that they have a place.
> > >
> > > Regarding org.json, I looked for the Geronimo bundled version, and
> there
> > > was one, but it was for a later version of the library (2009... not
> > 2007).
> > >  I've not tried building Web Console 4.0.0, so don't know what maven
> > would
> > > actually find and use.
> > >
> > > Regards, Graham.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 21 November 2012 10:44, Darren <darrenslists@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > In the interest of fast deployment, I suggest the Felix project
> > > revisits
> > > > this and comes up with a webconsole-all bundle, which exports
> org.json,
> > > > Commons IO and Commons FileUpload for ease of deployment. For more
> > > > controlled, supported, or resource constrained we still have the
> > default
> > > > bundle, which only imports.
> > > >
> > > > For my (newcomer) situation, that would be ideal as bundles that work
> > out
> > > > of the box are more likely to get me experimenting with them.
> > > >
> > > > Documentation akin to what PAX web uses would also be helpful.  They
> > have
> > > > multiple bundles, but explain what each one is for, before
> introducing
> > > the
> > > > bundled bundle (pax-web-jetty-bundle).
> > > > http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/paxweb/Artifacts
> > > >
> > > > If Web Console followed a similar strategy, it would also be useful
> to
> > > > include more detailed instructions on how to meet the extra
> > dependencies
> > > > (as they are not all produced by the Web Console team).  The Felix
> > > commons
> > > > project looks like the right place to link to download from, but
> their
> > > > documentation doesn't include download links.
> > > > http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-commons.html
> > > >
> > > > Would it be possible to get json into Felix commons as well?
> > > >
> > > > If you don't have any influence over the Felix commons project,
> hosting
> > > > the pom files you contributed to it would allow users to build the
> > > > dependency bundles themselves.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Darren
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message