Mailing-List: contact users-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@felix.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of
 guillaume.yziquel@crossing-tech.com designates 84.16.68.90 as permitted
 sender)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:50:42 +0200
From: Guillaume Yziquel <guillaume.yziquel@crossing-tech.com>
To: users@felix.apache.org
Subject: Re: equinox/felix behaviour with lib/endorsed
Message-ID: <20120423135042.GA2189@gelfand>
References: <20120419075450.GA6876@gelfand>
 <4F900E23.8010106@ungoverned.org>
 <20120419131729.GA18848@gelfand>
 <4F9013EB.5040401@ungoverned.org>
 <20120419133643.GA19255@gelfand>
 <4F90156F.1060609@ungoverned.org>
 <20120423121350.GB30720@gelfand>
 <4F9559F0.8050604@ungoverned.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4F9559F0.8050604@ungoverned.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Le Monday 23 Apr 2012 � 09:32:32 (-0400), Richard S. Hall a �crit :
> 
> I assume you mean with relevant exports (for system bundle) and
> imports (in the bundle), then both work.

Yes.

> I think that is the correct behavior, no?

Yes. I was surprised that equinox is less strict.

> If it is not exported, then it should be visible, unless I'm
> misunderstanding your scenario.

I assume you meant 'not visible'. Equinox sees it even if not exported
(in the system bundle). That's the behaviour I've been puzzled by.

> -> richard

-- 
Guillaume Yziquel
Crossing-Tech
Parc Scientifique EPFL

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org