Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 28040 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2011 16:35:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Mar 2011 16:35:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 27397 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:35:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-users-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 27307 invoked by uid 500); 3 Mar 2011 16:35:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 27299 invoked by uid 99); 3 Mar 2011 16:35:07 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:35:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.53] (HELO mail-ww0-f53.google.com) (74.125.82.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 16:35:03 +0000 Received: by wwb29 with SMTP id 29so1722727wwb.10 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:34:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WtfhR4IEvIBhiL4nvld0IrPSq3DJ2MJrkWLlK5K3d3Q=; b=BGzeuWnncAHs/kVib3Yrtsy35z0sblWzA/iYpj1jZyKwhaUpvQwa3lwX20pi6PxbIL Q4IGhxnkPA9+2YGIFd3zRQ93OlB7MQyFPg4J5WwlG4mRBiSCrke3SzPBwrhGjchIDXeZ vP504C3xz8qKFybNHRLAZdVm7BLrKtcB8R6es= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Q4EQJ01Vj7UbHVn75p2iz5/hny4mqCg6gOXNOcrg2L1pMR3sla2n+6sIQbq4xz703U J/0/sqVFGoaUqdhu7gZP1gJnw7oOgTZFTiWVPgQxrSKcoFH6mMI85cI6ltqWs/hFCx3o 4xRbyJA0i/a4L3G0xb7V5PZFpkzTuOKdhtwtY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.173.203 with SMTP id q11mr1168645wbz.35.1299170081739; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 08:34:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.156.139 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:34:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D6FB18B.8000203@ungoverned.org> References: <4D6F5B51.6040606@gmail.com> <1299145068.16271.368.camel@meschbix> <4D6F6323.8030907@gmail.com> <4D6FB18B.8000203@ungoverned.org> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:34:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Deployment Admin implementation From: Guillaume Nodet To: users@felix.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 16:19, Richard S. Hall wrote: > On 3/3/11 7:08, Marcel Offermans wrote: >> >> What is missing is mainly support to uninstall deployment packages. Apac= he >> ACE uses the current implementation, but it never uninstalls a deploymen= t >> package (it replaces it with a new, empty version) so we never got round= to >> implementing that. >> >> A contribution there would definitely help. >> >> I also don't mind releasing a version as is, if that's what people want. > > Better to release it and give it a low version number, then never release > it. +1 > > -> richard > >> Greetings, Marcel >> >> >> On 3 Mar 2011, at 10:45 , niibasta@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> Thanks for information. >>> >>> When do you plan to make a release? Maybe I can help to make it faster? >>> :) Close bugs, f.e. >>> >>> On 03.03.2011 12:37, Felix Meschberger wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We in fact have an implementation already in Apache Felix: >>>> >>>> =A0 http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/deploymentadmin/ >>>> >>>> I don't think we have a release yet. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Felix >>>> >>>> Am Donnerstag, den 03.03.2011, 09:11 +0000 schrieb niibasta@gmail.com: >>>>> >>>>> Hello! >>>>> >>>>> Is there any closest plans to implement Deployment Admin Spec. It see= ms >>>>> that Eclipse Virgo already has a common ability (PAR's, Plans and >>>>> Configurations). I'm interesting, if such functions will be implement= ed >>>>> in Felix. It would be very useful to implement something like Plan in >>>>> Virgo and use it with Repository Admin. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org > > --=20 Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org