Mailing-List: contact users-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@felix.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of clement.escoffier@gmail.com
 designates 72.14.220.156 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=aFTGEc0nihWQBhppatne66m00/eNj77u0Euorl8n3KL5XoHsxrJr5ySYkEib2f35sE
         A9JtF3okpFzCLRsN3KQwLu2JQKB0zYSEmC12VEB/mOTM/VxYXvxiinlG3bTZRFG5eVUM
         cyO3quOilIDmB+0JHxqp1tkWlRAJ0KkqGzYh4=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Subject: Re: Will iPOJO 1.6.0 support inheritance of annotations?
From: Clement Escoffier <clement.escoffier@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <o2vb34673da1004081029x65c4b021y49f8af388031f259@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 19:38:03 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D36D1087-D1AC-481B-88C0-F7811F2964E6@gmail.com>
References: <s2ob34673da1004080715q8a336c21w5f6b20ec5ab29d50@mail.gmail.com>
 <1B4C0914-5D84-40D4-A99A-487BA3FD97DD@gmail.com>
 <o2vb34673da1004081029x65c4b021y49f8af388031f259@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@felix.apache.org


On 08.04.2010, at 19:29, Bengt Rodehav wrote:

> OK - looking forward to 1.8.0 then. Any ideas when 1.8.0 will be =
released?

Waou .... hard to say but I guess around July.=20

Clement

>=20
> /Bengt
>=20
> 2010/4/8 Clement Escoffier <clement.escoffier@gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> On 08.04.2010, at 16:15, Bengt Rodehav wrote:
>>=20
>>> Just read in a post that iPOJO 1.6.0 is pretty close. I have =
recently
>>> started to use iPOJO and find it extremely useful. It provides a =
very
>>> convenient programming model - especially when using annotations.
>>> However, I want to put some annotations (defining some @Property's,
>>> @ServiceProperty's and @Validate/@Invalidate/@Controller/@Requires) =
in
>>> a common, reusable, base class. This is to make it easier to create
>>> new services for us (otherwise we will need a lot of boilerplate =
code
>>> that needs to be maintained). I read somewhere that iPOJO was going =
to
>>> provide support for this in the future. My question is if this
>>> "future" is iPOJO 1.6.0?
>>=20
>> So the bad news is : no this feature will not be inside the 1.6.0
>> The good news is : it will be on the 1.8.0 because of a major =
rewriting of the manipulator (constructor injection, (method) annotation =
inheritance).
>>=20
>> The field injection of parent class requires more work and despite on =
the roadmap it is not really planned.
>>=20
>> Regards,
>>=20
>> Clement
>>=20
>>>=20
>>> /Bengt
>>>=20
>>> =
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>=20


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org