felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Neil Bartlett <njbartl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Including sources in bundles
Date Sun, 23 Apr 2017 14:55:07 GMT
I agree that this is a usability issue that should be fixed in the tool. It’s just not practical
to expect everybody to adopt the convention of putting source under OSGI-OPT.


> On 23 Apr 2017, at 15:21, Thomas Watson <tjwats@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think including source is fine.
> Did you mean OSGI-OPT instead of OSGI-INF.  The spec recommends OSGI-OPT be
> used to include source.
> I am concerned that bndtools makes it hard for one such as you to debug our
> code.  If it is hard for you then it is impossible for the masses.  This
> seems like a pretty big usability issue in bndtools.  Are not the source
> jars published to maven central for the tools to find?
> Tom.
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 2:13 AM, David Jencks <david.a.jencks@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Working on FELIX-5618 I couldn’t figure out a way to debug DS in bndtools
>> without modifying the DS bundle to include sources.  This is certainly the
>> easiest way to get the sources visible in a bndtools environment.  After
>> this experience I’d like to include the sources for DS in OSGI-INF as
>> recommended by Peter et al.  I’d like to include the sources in the util
>> jar as well, I think then the extender base classes will show up in the DS
>> bundle.
>> Any objections?
>> thanks
>> david jencks

View raw message