Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: Implementation of unreleased spec and community
From: Neil Bartlett <njbartlett@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA66Tpqt9wU_5s80SsbZ0zmTKQyu0zCuhBqc+vFwRLJfNr9yAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:46:38 +0000
Cc: dev@aries.apache.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DF962C70-0B9E-4AE7-A7DA-7DB356348C4D@gmail.com>
References: <CAA66Tpqt9wU_5s80SsbZ0zmTKQyu0zCuhBqc+vFwRLJfNr9yAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@felix.apache.org
archived-at: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:46:59 -0000

Guillaume,

All OSGi specifications in progress are publicly visible, so in what =
sense are Apache community members unable to be involved in the =
development of the RIs?

Regards,
Neil

> On 18 Jan 2017, at 10:41, Guillaume Nodet <gnodet@apache.org> wrote:
>=20
> I'm a bit concerned by some subprojects in our communities.
>=20
> The ASF is supposed to be "community over code", so the very basic =
thing
> for a project is that people can get involved.
>=20
> However, I see more and more code developped as a reference =
implementation
> of a spec which is not publicly available, because it's still being
> developed at the OSGi Alliance.  I find that very disturbing because
> there's no way the community can get involved unless they are OSGi =
Alliance
> members, and that's clearly not acceptable imho.
>=20
> Thoughts ?
> Guillaume Nodet