felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] [POLICY] IP tracking for OSGi APIs
Date Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:24:57 GMT
Guillaume Nodet wrote
> My point is that there is a source identified, preferably public if
> possible, private if not.
> 
> Of course if the API is not public, we can refer to the private commit so
> that  PMC members which are not OSGi members can be confident about the IP
> tracking.
> I think it depends on what stage the API is.  For example, consider the
> work Ray is working on for CDI, I don't think the API is in the OSGi git
> repo yet, so either the API is committed there first, or the commit can
> refer to Ray's github repo directly.  If a spec has been published
> officially by the OSGi Alliance, we can refer to a public source too.
> Given the API code becomes public at the time it's given to the ASF, I
> didn't thought that would be a problem to have it in a public repo in the
> first place, but if you're saying it is... I'm fine with that.
> 
> So what about:
>   "All commits that includes API code from the OSGi Alliance are done in
> separate commit and include a reference to the public (preferably) or
> private (if not public) source  where the code comes from."
> 
> Does that look better to you ?
> 
Absolutely

 Carsten

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziegeler@apache.org

Mime
View raw message