felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Implementation of unreleased spec and community
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:26:25 GMT
Ok, assuming that the OSGi Alliance is not changing its model of
working, what do you propose to do?

Carsten

Guillaume Nodet wrote
> It seems either I have a hard time explaining myself, or you're all blind.
> I'll suppose the first one, so I'll try again.
> 
> Let's say someone comes to aries or felix saying: "i'd like to work on a RI
> for the xxx rfc".  At this point, that's fine if the RFC is kinda frozen.
> Let's imagine it's not, and the api package is changed to play a bit with
> latest EEG phone calls.  Only OSGi Alliance members can freely modify the
> API packages to reflect those changes.  Worse, someone can make a change in
> the API to be latter approved by the OSGi Alliance.
> 
> There's clearly a difference between apache committers who are OSGi members
> and those that are not.  Some of them can make changes, others don't.
> It looks like a problem to me.
> 
> Another concrete example is if someone comes to one ASF project saying:
> "I'd like to contribute this implementation of the RFC.  Btw, the RFC
> document does not yet reflect the changes in the RI, but it will soon".
> 
> Guillaume
> 



 

-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziegeler@apache.org

Mime
View raw message