Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10E13185FB for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 46482 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2015 10:22:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 46418 invoked by uid 500); 27 Oct 2015 10:22:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 46406 invoked by uid 99); 27 Oct 2015 10:22:25 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:22:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 39A1B1A2CEB for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:22:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BJGm7wXg4fLu for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hupie.dyndns.org (hupie.dyndns.org [80.101.237.101]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4DECF2095A for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 10:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from stinkpad.internal.hupie.com (unknown [188.205.88.52]) by hupie.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E4748B72D for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:22:16 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: git? To: dev@felix.apache.org References: <562C7AF7.9090003@die-schneider.net> <1445851412.8246.10.camel@apache.org> <2739367.vny9fY6rKH@madness> <562F2751.70505@apache.org> From: Ferry Huberts Message-ID: <562F5058.3030707@hupie.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:22:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Side-line for me too. How about just using 'git svn ...' Work locally in git, store in svn. What's the big deal? If there are blocking process issues _then_ you switch, right? On 27/10/15 11:16, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > Just looking from the side-line of this ... > ... but all of this sounds more like a lot of pain compared to the gain. > > SVN isn't that bad after all, so why fix something that isn't really broken? > Right now I don't see much of a benefit to this, but as I'm not part of any > decision makers here, > take this just as a little hint :-) > > regards, Achim > > > 2015-10-27 11:12 GMT+01:00 Benson Margulies : > >> My recommendation at this point in the discussion is to convert the >> repo _en bloc_, then split out very independent things (if any), and >> only then contemplate add-ons. >> > > > -- Ferry Huberts