felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Guillaume Nodet <gno...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Release Felix framework next version
Date Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:59:37 GMT
Yes, we need a resolver release.

Which patch are we talking about here ?
I can apply it ...

Guillaume

2015-04-17 17:37 GMT+02:00 Richard S. Hall <heavy@ungoverned.org>:

> On 4/17/15 11:04 , Karl Pauls wrote:
>
>> Right, I was assuming I do a release of the resolver as well - correct?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Karl
>>
>> p.s.: Guillaume, are you going to integrate the patch from Tom (if so, let
>> me know if you need more time - otherwise, I'll go ahead and cut the
>> release on Sunday)
>>
>
> I think we should include the patch...
>
> -> richard
>
>
>
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Richard S. Hall <heavy@ungoverned.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  On 4/17/15 07:26 , Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>>>
>>>  I think we're good to go.
>>>>
>>>>  Does this also mean that we need to release a new version of the
>>> resolver
>>> since the framework uses it and it has a dependency on a resolver
>>> snapshot?
>>>
>>> -> richard
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Cheers,
>>>> Guillaume Nodet
>>>>
>>>> 2015-04-13 19:40 GMT+02:00 Karl Pauls <karlpauls@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>   I'll do the release - just let me know when you are done.
>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, April 13, 2015, Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@apache.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Am 13.04.15 um 18:17 schrieb Guillaume Nodet:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The Karaf community would like to release another milestone of Karaf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  4.0
>>>>>> which includes the new Felix framework based on the Felix resolver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So a few questions :
>>>>>>>     * does anyone object to this release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  No objection, but :) David and myself are currently working
on
>>>>>> improving
>>>>>> the service registry. We're nearly done. So if we could get time
until
>>>>>> the end of this week, that would be great.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      * what version should it be, given it's a quite big change,
we
>>>>>> could
>>>>>> go
>>>>>> to 5.0 imho
>>>>>> 5.0 sounds good to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carsten
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Carsten Ziegeler
>>>>>> Adobe Research Switzerland
>>>>>> cziegeler@apache.org <javascript:;>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>> Karl Pauls
>>>>> karlpauls@gmail.com
>>>>> http://twitter.com/karlpauls
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/karlpauls
>>>>> https://profiles.google.com/karlpauls
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message