Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 554DA1181D for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95482 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2014 15:37:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 95369 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jul 2014 15:37:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 95241 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jul 2014 15:37:04 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:37:04 +0000 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:37:04 +0000 (UTC) From: "Simone Tripodi (JIRA)" To: dev@felix.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (FELIX-4547) Implement the missing resources registration MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simone Tripodi updated FELIX-4547: ---------------------------------- Attachment: FELIX-4547.patch I think it would be good to start the discussion about resources registration implementation by showing some code... is that direction right? WDYT? Is there anything else that needs to be taken care? TIA! :) > Implement the missing resources registration > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: FELIX-4547 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-4547 > Project: Felix > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: HTTP Service > Affects Versions: http-2.4.0 > Reporter: Simone Tripodi > Fix For: http-2.4.0 > > Attachments: FELIX-4547.patch > > > Current implementation of RFC189 does not support yet resources registration. > Questions are: > * do we want to have a servlet implementation which serves a static file? > or > * looking for a solution that delegates the underlying servlet container? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)