Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 186F411E1F for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48895 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2014 10:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-felix-dev-archive@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 48824 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2014 10:57:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@felix.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@felix.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@felix.apache.org Received: (qmail 48805 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2014 10:57:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:57:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mcculls@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.179] (HELO mail-qc0-f179.google.com) (209.85.216.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:57:33 +0000 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id x3so2918306qcv.38 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:57:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=k1oAJGu3/qb+yp48oZ2iPrcJpmjMvIGW45z+NnnIgs8=; b=CjzZgpwp2BR/GY2H4xRpKUQdMd+toANv9hg/FKuX3+Vv4oRyRv839kz/a7VuOh4YZs rbGMUelGeZZMszsMXl8Utn2L9KGZTuUd56eEdW7XN4jYPuUpCZYoRl9XGRmWxpgC0pmv PM61qZGZflopFsmom0jDgp3oxEVCFrLHVNh2m5O+ryGpEYjGRVPZsjhp7rj9/fjPxtZj Yg+jrS391KOGAtZvBCztuuR4JJUIbLwK7MS+fmXpKo+v2ha/FrgQv+KWFq5GSATw6E2W 0nb6EbD6MR3vE5xVUgrT3oZC1qNwM873mmFV82poJymMQWXjqJEGldcIs2FKw+qZUkfC 73PQ== X-Received: by 10.140.96.229 with SMTP id k92mr19085905qge.38.1403780232899; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (host109-148-210-238.range109-148.btcentralplus.com. [109.148.210.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i10sm9808916qaq.22.2014.06.26.03.57.10 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Felix Bundle Repository version 2.0.2 From: Stuart McCulloch In-Reply-To: <63DB15B0-80F6-4130-9868-F57203ABA9DE@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:57:07 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <665A3254-88B4-496D-B26F-DFB06A6E98E3@gmail.com> References: <98FBDFE2-540E-49C2-8443-65FD8DF55E4E@gmail.com> <63DB15B0-80F6-4130-9868-F57203ABA9DE@gmail.com> To: dev@felix.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Key added, signatures all check out, contents look good so +1 (binding) = from me On 26 Jun 2014, at 11:38, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > No worries, I=92ll get it added. >=20 > On 26 Jun 2014, at 11:37, David Bosschaert = wrote: >=20 >> Yeah - as a non-PMC member I cannot add my key to dist/felix/KEYS >> But, as I said it's in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/KEYS >>=20 >> Let me know if I need to do anything else for this... >>=20 >> Cheers, >>=20 >> David >>=20 >> On 26 June 2014 11:28, David Bosschaert = wrote: >>> I have added my key to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/KEYS = but >>> not to the dist/felix/KEYS >>> For some reason I thought that the dist location was limited to PMC >>> members, but maybe it isn't. Let me try... >>>=20 >>> Cheers, >>>=20 >>> David >>>=20 >>> On 26 June 2014 11:22, Stuart McCulloch wrote: >>>> Hi David, >>>>=20 >>>> Have you uploaded you public signing key to = http://www.apache.org/dist/felix/KEYS ? >>>>=20 >>>> = http://felix.apache.org/documentation/development/release-management-nexus= .html#appendix-a-create-and-add-your-key-to-httpwwwapacheorgdistfelixkeys >>>>=20 >>>> Once I can verify the GPG signatures then I can +1 this release. >>>>=20 >>>> =97 >>>> Cheers, Stuart >>>>=20 >>>> On 23 Jun 2014, at 16:09, davidb@apache.org wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Hi, >>>>>=20 >>>>> I'm calling a vote on Felix Bundle Repository version 2.0.2. >>>>>=20 >>>>> It's been a long time since the OBR has been released, and since = it >>>>> now also provides the OSGi Repository API 1.0 I think this = warrants a >>>>> version of 2.0.x. Note that the exported packages are semantically >>>>> versioned. >>>>> This release replaces failed release attempt for version 2.0.0 = which >>>>> failed the vote because of omissions in the DEPENDENCIES and = NOTICES >>>>> files. I have also added the sources using the maven-source-plugin = to >>>>> this release. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Staging repository: >>>>> = https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachefelix-1025/ >>>>>=20 >>>>> You can use this UNIX script to download the release and verify = the signatures: >>>>> = http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/check_staged_release.sh >>>>>=20 >>>>> Usage: >>>>> sh check_staged_release.sh 1025 /tmp/felix-staging >>>>>=20 >>>>> Changes: >>>>> New Feature: >>>>> * [FELIX-4368] - Support OSGi Repository 1.0 Specification >>>>> ** [FELIX-4369] - Support repository.xml as defined by OSGi = Repository spec >>>>> ** [FELIX-4370] - Support Repository service as defined by OSGi = spec >>>>> ** [FELIX-4371] - Pass the Repository 1.0 OSGi CT >>>>> -> The results of the OSGi Repository CT can be found here: >>>>> = http://people.apache.org/~davidb/felix_obr_2.0.0/TEST-org.osgi.test.cases.= repository-5.0.0.xml >>>>>=20 >>>>> Bug fixed: >>>>> * [FELIX-3257] - OBR resolver unable to pick up the highest bundle >>>>> version when selecting the best candidate >>>>> * [FELIX-2465] - system.bundle should be automatically wired to = the >>>>> relevant bundle >>>>> * [FELIX-3842] - NPE in LocalRepositoryImpl >>>>>=20 >>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>=20 >>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (please provide specific comments) >>>>>=20 >>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks, >>>>>=20 >>>>> David Bosschaert >>>>=20 >=20