felix-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Emanuele Gesuato (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (FELIX-3751) junit4osgi swingrunner improvement with a more flexible layout
Date Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:19:00 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Emanuele Gesuato updated FELIX-3751:
------------------------------------

    Attachment: org.apache.felix.ipojo.junit4osgi.swing-gui.zip

swingrunner improved with flexible layout and search facility
                
> junit4osgi swingrunner improvement with a more flexible layout
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-3751
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3751
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: iPOJO
>    Affects Versions: iPOJO-1.6.0
>         Environment: The problem affects either linux or windows oses. 
>            Reporter: Emanuele Gesuato
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: junit
>         Attachments: org.apache.felix.ipojo.junit4osgi.swing-gui.zip
>
>
> The junit4osgi SwingRunner JFrame is currently created with a fixed layout. So if you
try to enlarge the JFrame the content of the panel remains "fixed" with its own width and
height.
> This improvement allow the user to have a more comfortable user experience with a flexible
layout manager. If the user tries to resize the new jframe the content of the jframe will
be resized.
> It was not so simple to create it because the source files in the trunk repository were
not "right". It seems they were missing the constructor with InstanceManager parameter. Also
there are some methods that were missing: the OSGIJUnitRunner field was not setted in any
place. The result of my work was done decompiling the .class of SwingRunner. The result of
its decompiling was quite different from the source file because in the decompiled one I got
the missing methods. It seems that the .class was generated from a different source file than
the one present in the repository.
>  
> I saw that the jframe was designed with netbeans: is it possible that the ide "removed"
some of the missing methods ?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message